🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about that comments made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at the majors: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three players in the sport in succession. He is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is placed number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive power on both front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

The American has made a number of dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American creating numerous chances to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a horrendous game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive effort to win it. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {